Could Adnan Syed be an innocent man incarcerated?

On February 28, 1999, nineteen days after his ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee’s body was found in a shallow grave in Leakin Park, Adnan Syed was arrested for first degree murder. Adnan was only seventeen. “On February 25, 2000 Adnan was found guilty of first degree murder, kidnappingfalse imprisonment, and robbery.”(Wikipedia Par.5)  Adnan has been in jail ever since that day.

In 2014 ,the podcast, Serial became a big hit after Sarah Koenig try’s to figure out what happened the day of January 13, 1999, the day Hae went missing. So what did happen that day? As I listened to Serial’s first and last podcast in season one, it becomes evident that no one truly knows that happened that day, except for Hae and her murderer. It is also clear someone is lying, whether it be Jay or Adnan. To be able to convict Adnan on the little evidence put against him, is unhinged. After learning about the case, I feel the same as Koenig, “as a juror I vote to acquit Adnan Syed” (Koenig Ep. 12) stating, “that’s what the law requires of jurors.” (Koenig Ep.12) because of such little evidence that was provided in the case. I also feel the exact same when she says, “If you asked me to to swear Adnan Syed is innocent, I couldn’t do it.” (Koenig Ep.12) followed by, “I mean, most of the time I think he didn’t do it” (Koenig Ep.12) a lot of time time there is reason to believe he is innocent, but there is a lot of things that make Adnan look bad, things that you have to question; there’s reasoning to believe that he could  be either guilty or innocent, but there is just not enough evidence prove either. The part of the case that landed Adnan in jail, was a simple word against word. Unfortunately, Adnan didn’t exactly have a word, he didn’t remember that day, “your asking me to remember details from a day six weeks ago” (Koegin Ep. 1), specifically the details of the twenty one minutes after school, that his case, “lived and died in” (Koegin Ep. 1).

Do you remember what you did three weeks ago? Let alone six? How about details? What time did you wake up? Did you work? What did you eat? I sure don’t. But this is what a seventeen year old had to remember to keep him out of jail. If Adnan did not kill Hae, then it makes total sense to me that he wouldn’t remember the day. If he did, its perfect excuse. But lets go further into the reasons that Adnan could be an innocent man convicted.

The state’s key witness against Adnan, is Jay. Jay say’s that Adnan told him he was going to kill Hae. Red flag. Why did Jay not go to the police right away? Had I been told something like this, I certainly would, leading to question why he wouldn’t. Jay also says that they met in a “Best Buy parking lot” (Koeing Ep. 1), where Adnan proceeded to show Jay, Hae’s dead body, but that is a pretty open spot to show someone that. It doesn’t make sense that he would show that in such a populated area, where anyone could see. Another reason that Jay’s claim is questionable is that it changes, continuously. Jay never tells the same story twice, so, “if Jay is willing to repeatedly lie to the cops in order to avoid getting in trouble for buying and selling pot, why on earth would he not also be willing to lie in order to avoid getting in trouble for murder?”(Susan Par.16).

Asia McClain presents an alibi for Adnan. She can testify that Adnan was in the library after school on January 13, 1999. Had this piece of evidence been brought up in 1999, there would have been three people to provide a statement, that Adnan couldn’t of killed Hae, because he was at the public library. There is evidence to believe that Adnan’s Lawyer Cristina Gutierrez,  “threw the case on purpose to get more money from the attorney” (Koenig) as Rabia believes.

 

Serial’s Convicted Murderer: Adnan Syed

Within the last few days, I had to opportunity to listen to a podcast called, Serial. Serial is a podcast about a convicted murderer, Adnan Syed. Adnan is accused of murdering his ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee. The narrator, Sarah Koenig, provides details about what happened the day of January 13, 1999. She includes the voices of people who who were actually involved in the case including, Adnan, Jay, Roise and Asia. I think Koenig did this, not only to provide more details about the case, but to make it sound more realist. While listening, I enjoyed the other voices because it made me feel like I was involved in the story, it was real, this did happen and I was hearing the stories of people that actually were apart of the case.

Supposedly, this podcast has become quite popular and I can see why. Overall I thoroughly enjoyed the podcast, it made me want to listen to the whole series to find out what happens and what Koenig will further find out. I want to listen more because Koenig does a great job of explaining the different stories.  I think that podcast journalism is a great way to present a story and she has done a excellent job of it herself. I question why this way of journalism isn’t very popular, its very interesting and leaves a good impact on the audience. I think this specific type of report is really well suited to be presented through a podcast because you get all the facts through a series that keeps going, you continue to learn as the reporter learns. The audience knows just as much as the narrator. The informal voice really helped with making me want to continue to listen, I was being talked to rather than at.

The first episode of Koenig’s podcast has made me question Adnans conviction. Is he really guilty?

Robia and her brother, friends of Adnan, beleive that he is not guilty. They believe that his lawyer, “threw the case on purpose to get more money from the attorney” (Koenig). Considering she has had previous encounters with the law, I think that it’s reasonable to question this. After I listened to the first episode of Serial, I can say that I agree with Robia’s statement. Even Adnan’s lawyer’s son says, “I’m not going to defend my mom if she didn’t do her job. If there is evidence in the trial that wasn’t brought up, I think he definitely should get a retrial.”(George, par. 14). I wonder why Asia’s statement, that gave Andnan an alibi, would not be taken to court! There would of been two other witnesses if what she stated was true. I agree with Robia for questioning why this was never brought up in court because it seems like a game changer. Koenig, begins the podcast stating how hard it is to account for your time, something Adnan couldn’t do for that day. It’s true, what did you do a week ago?  21 minutes are what “lived and died” in Adnan’s case, they are what convicted him. But someone can account for these minutes of his time, and they were never brought up in court, his lawyer ignored letters giving Adnan an alibi. Now 15 years later this is being questioned, and I think it should be.

I can imaging the fustration of Adnan’s family having their family memeber in prison and knowing their is a piece of evidence that could have made the jury vote, not guilty. I feel like his family must be happy this podcast is out, because it’s bringing attention to Adnans case. It could change his life sentence.

 

Work Cited

Koenig, Sarah. “Season one”.Audio Blog Post. Serial.

George, Justin. “Son of ‘Serial’ subject’s lawyer defends mother”. The Baltimore Sun. Web. 9 April 2015. http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/crime/bs-md-serial-syed-lawyer-20150408-story.html. Acessed 21 July 2017.

 

 

 

The Girl Who Was Saturday Night From a Feminist View

My blog will be discussing how Heather O’Neils, The Girl Who Was Saturday Night embodies feminism. The entire book is about Nouschka trying to find her identity, a feminist journey. I will discuss how men interfere and limit Nouschka’s life.

 

Works Cited

12 Things Wrong With Feminism. Digital Image. Gurl. Web. Accessed 21 July 2017.

Can you Win a Beauty Pagent. Digital Image. PlayBuzz. Web. Accessed 21 July 2017 .

Feminism. Digital Image. Berry College. Web. Acessed 21 July 2017.

Feminism Is For Everyone.Digital Image.Just A girl. Web. Acessed 21 July 2017.

National Post. “The Girl Who Was Saturday Night , by Heath O’Neil: Review .”National Post. N.p., 4 May 2014. Web. <http://nationalpost.com/entertainment/books/book-reviews/the-     girl-who-was-Saturday-night-by-heather-oneill-review/wcm/6af453e4-14b5-4aa8-a8a3-8f3e677ace5b>.  Accessed 20 July 2017.

O’Neil , Heather. The Girl Who Was Saturday Night. Toronto, Ontario :                       HarperCollinsPublishersLtd , 2014. Print.

The Girl Who was Saturday Night Book. Digital Image. HarperCollins. 2014. Web. Accessed 21 July 2017.

The Girl Who was Saturday Night. Digital Image. National Post. 2014. Web. Accessed 21 July 2017.

Heather O’Neil. Digital Image. International Festival Of authors. Web. Assessed 21 July 2017 .

 

The Girl Who Was Saturday Night – Archetypes Within

I have been reading the novel, The Girl Who Was Saturday Night by, Heather O’Neil. The reason for choosing this book is because I am a twin and find the Quebec culture beautiful and intriguing. This novel explores the life of two twins living in Quebec’s Capital, Montreal during the french referendum. Nicolas and Nouschka’s father Etienne, is a very famous french song writer. Due to this, the twins are well known throughout Quebec. They grew up on TV, and when their father had no use for them, they lived either their grandparents. They never knew their mother, until Nicolas found her recently and the twins went to meet her, without Nouschka knowing where they were going. Now in their 20s, their father is in jail and they’re still in the same bedroom as before, at their grandparents. Not much has changed since they were kids.

I will be displaying the archetypes presented, half way through the novel. The book is presented through Nouschka’s point of view. O’Neil describes the characters in the book to follow archetypes of  literary theory, she also gives readers a good understanding of the archetypes presented. In this blog, I will present the archetypes I view within the characters presented. The archetypes I have been introduced to include, a hero, a child and tricksters. All classic archetypes in literature.

In the novel, The Girl Who Was Saturday Night, I view Nouschka as a heroic archetype. She is trying to do what is best for her life and clean up her mistakes brought on to her life because of her father and Nicolas. Nouschka presents heroic characteristics multiple times. She has worked at a magazine store, since she was 16 to make money after dropping out of school with her brother. She uses the money she makes to help her brother pay for child support. Nouschka will pick up Nicolas’ son, Pierrot from his mothers house, rather than Nicolas. Since her and her brother dropped out of school, she has decided to go back to high school to get a diploma. Nicolas doesn’t follow  Nouschka’s decisions. A hero to me, helps others and Nouschka presents this in the novel. Nouschka is a lot more responsible than her brother. Nouschka’s beauty is an archetype that also helps her in life. At bars she is very popular, “The stools on either side of me were immediately filled up” (O’Neil 24) all the boys in the bars wanted to know her. Misha, an ex-lover of Nouschka, is also a heroic character. He helps Nouschka in times of need and sadness. Misha sees that the twins are attached at the hip, “the world won’t fall apart if you spend the night away from each other.” (O’Neil 33). He wants to help her get away from Nicolas and his bad ways.

On the heroic journey, Nouschka has come from and innocent childhood.  She is still in the same environment she has always known. I believe next, some sort of  dangerous journey will occur that Nouschka will go on (based on the archetype journey). I believe she will leave Montreal, without Nicolas, having to complete some sort of task (possibly to overcome life without her brother) and finally return home realizing she does not need Nicolas anymore.

Nichols is a trickster. He creates trouble wherever he goes. I believe he takes after his father, his father tricks women into sleeping with him, this is exactly how and why, the twins were born. Their father also has a fox like personality. Nicolas is a thief, young father, and trouble maker.  As a teenager, Nicolas had a son, Pierrot with a young girl. A young girl he tricked into being his girlfriend, “by promising that he could get her a record deal through his dad’s contacts” (O’Neil 79-80). This never happened, and their relationship ended with Pierrot, their son. I view Etienne and Nicolas as the two only tricksters introduced so far in the book. Nicholas reminds me of Robbinhood and how he steals for the good. He steals to help.

There is also the archetype of a child, Pierrot. A innocent, sad boy, “sweet pierrot tremblay, the saddest boy in all the world, was not buying what we were selling”(O’Neil 82). Pierrot is not involved very much so far I n the book. It is very obvious that Nicolas is not a very good father. He can’t pick up his own son or care for him. Nicolas relys on his sister to look after his son. The innocence of the child shows through. You can also see the archetype of a child when the twins are decided in their youth. Being forced into shows and used by their father.

O’Neil, has done a very good job at presenting the archetypes of literary theory.  I believe she does a good job of presenting them by detailing describing the characters. She presents classic archetypes of literature. I look forward to being introduced to more characters in the book that bring forard new archetypes.

Links

http://animal-dream.com/fox.html

http://dreamicus.com/hero.html

http://dreamicus.com/journey.html

https://www.google.ca/amp/nationalpost.com/entertainment/books/book-reviews/the-girl-who-was-saturday-night-by-heather-oneill-review/wcm/6af453e4-14b5-4aa8-a8a3-8f3e677ace5b/amp

http://www.soulcraft.co/essays/the_12_common_archetypes.html

The Requirement of English Class- is it Necessary?

As I begin to research universities and their programs I notice that a grade twelve university English credit (and/or a grade twelve French credit) is a requirement of all schools and programs in Canada. In September of 1999 the OSSD requirements were changed  but before and after this change, a grade twelve English credit was and still is a requirement to graduate high school. The change came with, the provincial secondary school literacy requirement, in the form of a test, that all grade 10 student must pass in order to graduate high school.

So, should grade twelve University level English be a requirement for entry into all university programs?

I understand the purpose of learning English throughout school to be mandatory. In Canada, English (as well as French) is our nations official languages. It is important to know proper grammar, spelling and how to read and write; all important and necessary skills needed in university. Do I need to learn English until grade twelve though?

Through thirteen years of learning English from kindergarten to grade eleven, I believe that I, a student should be equipped and prepared with all English skills required in day to day life. I should have all skills necessary to write sufficient essays throughout university, and the knowledge and language to successfully understand readings given to me in university programs.  I believe that universities need to reconsider if having a grade twelve English is very helpful in all programs that they offer.

I believe that having grade twelve English is unnecessary depending on the university program a student wishes to attend.  I do think it should be required for certain programs, including ones that focus on English, language and business. I personally wish to attend a science based program and believe that taking a grade twelve English credit takes away from my opportunity to take more science based courses in grade twelve, to prepare for a university program I will take.

To finalize, I believe English is a very important class that should be mandatory until grade eleven. In grade twelve my opinion is that, ENG4U should only be taken depending on the program you wish to take in university or if an individual enjoys the subject.

 

Links 

http://www.eqao.com/en/assessments/OSSLT

https://focusonpeople.com/solutions/graduate-nationalisation-development

http://www.ilc.org/school/courses/dip_reqs_need.php

http://www.writeawriting.com/essay/effective-tips-writing-essay/